NDAs are often seen as simple contracts, but they can still create risk when confidentiality obligations, residual knowledge, disclosure scope, term, return obligations, and governing law are not handled properly.
A clear NDA playbook helps legal and business teams review NDAs faster while keeping risk positions consistent.
Confidential information definition
The definition should be broad enough to protect sensitive information but not so broad that it creates unreasonable obligations.
Term of confidentiality
Some information may need protection for a fixed period, while trade secrets may require longer protection.
Permitted disclosures
The agreement should clearly define when disclosure is allowed, such as to employees, advisors, affiliates, or legal authorities.
Residual knowledge
Residuals clauses should be reviewed carefully because they may allow a receiving party to use retained knowledge.
Injunctive relief
This is commonly accepted, but the wording should not create excessive remedies.
Governing law and jurisdiction
The preferred position should be defined by the company’s legal policy.
How LiteCLM Helps
LiteCLM can review NDAs against your playbook, detect unacceptable positions, suggest fallback language, and escalate only the issues that need legal attention.
Ready to modernize contract operations?
Review NDAs faster with intelligent playbook automation. Book a LiteCLM demo.
Request a Demo